A little rant follows…

Why employ an average person in an average job, with an average job description and paying them an average salary? Making decisions such as these based on market-related theories / practices is just an euphemism for being decidedly average.

Why not employ an exceptional person, who maybe doesn’t fit a specific job description, but contributes bucketloads of unique value for which you can pay them a very good (and fair salary) based on their value contribution?

Sounds quite easy, doesn’t it? And yes – I’m looking at you corporates…

12 Responses to “Market-Related Bullshit” (You?)

  1. Gavin Elliott 1 September 2009 at 3:46 pm Permalink

    Nail on head. Corporates don’t get that type of thing though, you’d be lucky to find one that does. However, if you did find one that does think like that you’d also usually find the people working for them loving their jobs because they LOVE adding value to a company that loves them for it.

    Easy when you think about it ;)

    Gavin

  2. Analiza Rebelo 1 September 2009 at 3:47 pm Permalink

    You hit the nail on the head there!

  3. JohnONolan 1 September 2009 at 9:16 pm Permalink

    Totally agree! Another angle is if you’re willing to take someone who’s NOT exceptional but who you see a lot of potential in, and MAKE them exceptional.

  4. Etienne 1 September 2009 at 9:34 pm Permalink

    In the ideal world – I agree. Deciding on staff often depends on the requirement – you’re not going to hire a ’superstar’ for a supermarket cashier position due to cost/benefits. Here’s to ideals *cheers, tips glass*

  5. Rob Schultz 2 September 2009 at 2:10 pm Permalink

    Like everyone before me has said, your little rant has hit the nail square on the head. It’s time for Corporations to wake up and take notice that average people aren’t what we need. In every place I have ever worked I have always come in under a specific job description, but was quickly pulled in to add value in other areas of the business based upon my varying past experiences. It made my employers happy and gave me the freedom to work outside of the silos that so many people find themselves in.

    Great post/rant. Exactly the kind of thing I like to read before I kick start my morning.

  6. Ross 2 September 2009 at 2:47 pm Permalink

    What about the average people?

    Not everyone can be exceptional, but they can provide a role where they’re needed.

    Some positions don’t need exceptional people.

    I’m not saying I disagree with you, but felt the approach a bit black and white… don’t forget the grays :)

  7. Adam 2 September 2009 at 9:55 pm Permalink

    Not everyone can be exceptional however you can push people to their hidden potential. Well done. Great post.

  8. Fred 3 September 2009 at 7:34 am Permalink

    @Ross, @Adam I strongly disagree with you both. Everyone can be exceptional at something, I’m a bit flabbergasted at the very concept that some people are going to suck based on… what… genetics? Environment? Geography? How do you possibly back up that statement?

    Let me rephrase. How can you truly believe some people can’t be exceptional? It’s absurd. Just as we can all be mediocre at many things, there may be one or two things we can exceed at in reference to the general populace.

    Perhaps “not everyone *chooses* to be exceptional” would be more appropriate because, that is really what separates the people Adii is talking about from the crop. Being exceptional is much more a conscious decision to follow your bliss than it is an inherent quality.

  9. Nokadota 15 September 2009 at 4:18 am Permalink

    This post and the comments were all spot-on, thanks for this. I will bookmark this to refer to in the future.

  10. Rob Schultz 3 September 2009 at 3:36 pm Permalink

    Yet another spot-on statement, Fred. Remember, we’re talking about the workplace. I have friends that don’t aspire to move up within their company and look at me like I’m a leper when I tell then I can’t go out on a Friday night because of business obligations. They’re awesome people and I wouldn’t trade them for anything, but they’re not the kind of people that I’d want to start a business with. In the working world, it’s important to surround yourself with people that are better than you, that push you, that make you want to push yourself. I think that’s more the point of this post.

  11. Ross 22 September 2009 at 6:48 pm Permalink

    Perhaps I should have used the phrase “want to” rather than “can”.

    There are plenty of people that don’t have the drive to excel in life, and they can fill the role of envelope filler, dish washer or whatever else they can get without any immense pressure.

    Company owners can still employ these people, but they’re more dispensable and certainly not mission critical in the business’ interests.

    Kinda optimistic and a bit naive thinking that everyone is going to want to excel in life. The word “deadbeat” was invented for a reason.

  12. Fred 3 September 2009 at 10:17 pm Permalink

    Well said, Rob.

Leave a Reply